Way too many posts here,

Since this made it to two pages.

FUCK YOU ALL YOU DUMBFUCKING MORONS WHY THE FUCK DO YOU EVER REPLY TO DENNIS TATE ANYMORE PLEASE STOP SPAMMING HIS THREADS BECAUSE THEY ARE ENDLESS THREADS OF DUMBSHITTERY.

Thank you.

Was that 10% total, or does it include the baksheesh?

You need to leash your negativity. Consider this: 3-Dimensional math as in length, width and height are erroneous when applied within a Cube like room for they do not account for the 4-corner perspective dimensions of difference as in '4-dimensional space'. Solar system, Earth sphere and human body all have a front, back and 2 sides which rotate between the 2 top and bottom poles - ceiling and floor parameters.

No single corner human can occupy or experience more than a single corner at the same time during a 4-corner rotation within the 4/16 creation principle. Earth sphere rotates within an invisible Time Cube. Unseen, humans have not the education or rationale to comprehend Nature's Simultaneous 4-Day Cube.

1 And Elias the prophet stood up, as a fire, and his word burnt like a torch.

9 Who wast taken up in a whirlwind of fire, in a chariot of fiery horses. 10 Who art registered in the judgments of times to appease the wrath of the Lord, to reconcile the heart of the father to the son, and to restore the tribes of Jacob

There were other creatures in the sea of fire that looked like huge worms. They would come to the surface and then disappear and then return to the surface. About 20 feet from him he saw them coming to the surface and they were coming towards him. When they reached him they began boring into him and went inside his body and brain and were coming out of his eyes. They were driving him insane. (where the worm dieth not) There is no end to these things in hell. They are eternal. There is no place to go for any relief. There is no love there. It is totally void of love. An emptiness beyond comprehension enveloped him.

It'd be like me citing maddox to prove that the titanic didn't sink.

Well, I'm done. I'll say this one last time Dennis, as I say it everytime, and your posts never seem to pay heed.

Concrete evidence.
These theories have none.

Peer-reviewed, is a word you should look for.
And even if it is reviewed, break that down, how did the peers review it?
The Bible is not an acceptable source in any research article done by one of the physical sciences. Any time a research article contains a reference from the bible, that's a pretty big red flag to questionable science.

It'd be like me citing maddox to prove that the titanic didn't sink.

You've sucked me in.
Fuck.

Scientific knowledge is always in a state of flux. New scientific discoveries come along and overthrow long-held hypotheses. A good example is the attempt by humanity to explain the phenomenon of light. Ancient religious texts around the world associated light with divine consciousness from which everything, including all other consciousness, originated. Before the dawn of science, humanity relied on religious experience and philosophy to understand light and the cosmos. Then Isaac Newton came along and theorized that light is composed of particles. Further scientific discovery overthrew this theory and led to the theory of light as a wave. When the photoelectric effect was discovered, the wave theory was ultimately overthrown which led to the "quantum" theory of light as a particle AND a wave. Interestingly enough, this duality corresponds with a current mathematical theory of chaos which may explain how consciousness might be both a part of the whole and the entire whole of a single non-localized consciousness.

Science has yielded some very unusual discoveries about light. The energy of light is infinite. Light was pervasive at the beginning of the universe. All matter is light (electromagnetic radiation). Time stops at the speed of light. This means that if you could travel at the speed of light, you could travel anywhere in the universe and live forever (never age). The speed of light is constant for all observers regardless of their relative speed or direction. Light particles can communicate with each other. Human observation transforms light waves into light particles to experience reality. Humanity's scientific discovery of the nature of light is the cornerstone of modern physics and natural law. It is also the cornerstone of NDE research and consciousness research.

The energy of light is infinite.

Light was pervasive at the beginning of the universe.

All matter is light (electromagnetic radiation).

Time stops at the speed of light. This means that if you could travel at the speed of light, you could travel anywhere in the universe and live forever (never age).

Human observation transforms light waves into light particles to experience reality.

I feel like an X-talker now.

There's lots wrong with that. It uses light as the penultimate force that binds all things in the universe, contradicting modern scientific paradigms that say that energy is the penultimate force. Toward the end of the second paragraph they are just straight up lying to you. Any source OTHER than this cite will show you that, This is why I'm telling you about "bad sources".






What he hell does this even mean? Light is a form of energy, energy isn't a property of light. You can't have light without energy.



What? Prove it.



Here we go. All matter is not light. electromagnetic radiation is what light is, yes, but that is just a form of energy. Matter has properties that cause either the absorption or reflection of light, which is why we perceive objects of different colours, because of this variation in the absorption qualities of certain things.

No before you ask "but where does all this energy go?" The law of conservation of eneergy says it doesn't go anywhere, it's just transformed into a different form (i.e. the sun heats up your dashboard, the light energy has been transformed to heat energy).



The author apparently just thought that this was neat? I guess it's one of the only actual truths in this paragraph, so there's a plus. It's currently untestable, though.





Human observation of light causes a deformation in the rhodopsin pigment of the eye, which causes a hyperpolarization event, transducing the light energy into electrical signals that are then sent to the visual cortex of our brains, which allow us to "see" light, or at least visible light..

Light energy is transformed into electrical energy which our brain then perceives as colours, objects, movement, etc. Not once in this process is light transformed into light particles. And the sloppy writer of this article knows that, as he stated in his first paragraph that Isaac Newton's light particle theory was disproved and the "light as a wave" mindset was embraced. So we basically either have him openly stating that he chooses to use research from 400 years ago instead of today's science, or the author feeding us horseshit and expecting us to applaud and shake his hand

Since this author has chosen to ignore the research of so many bright minds and the damning evidence that points away from light being the source of all energy, I choose to ignore his inane ramblings.

I feel like an X-talker now.

Initially motivated by a desire to debunk reincarnation, beginning in the mid-1960s, Helen Wambach conducted a 10-year survey of past-life recalls under hypnosis among 1,088 subjects. She asked very specific questions about the time periods in which people lived and the clothing, footwear, utensils, money, housing, etc. which they used or came in contact with. Wambach concluded found peoples' recollections to be amazingly accurate and wrote that ''fantasy and genetic memory could not account for the patterns that emerged in the results. With the exception of 11 subjects, all descriptions of clothing, footwear, and utensils were consistent with historical records.''


Victor Zammit describes Wambach's research thus:



By doing a scientific analysis on the past lives reported by her 10,000 plus volunteers she came up with some startling evidence in favor of reincarnation:

• 50.6 % of the past lives reported were male and 49.4 % were female — this is exactly in accordance with biological fact.

• The number of people reporting upper class or comfortable lives was in exactly the same proportion to the estimates of historians of the class distribution of the period.

• The recall by subjects of clothing, footwear, type of food and utensils used was better than that in popular history books. She found over and over again that her subjects knew better than most historians — when she went to obscure experts her subjects were invariably correct.

Her conclusion was:

'I don't believe in reincarnation — I know it!' (Wambach 1978).

In Life Before Life Dr. Wambach described the results of hypnotizing another 750 people and taking them to the time between their past and current lives. One of her most controversial findings was that people have some choice in their current lives and that the disembodied consciousness or soul does not enter the body until near birth. "The soul usually enters the body near birth, and has a choice of which fetus to enter. If one fetus is aborted, it is possible to choose another. In some cases, the soul who will occupy the fetus, is in contact with the soul of the mother, and can influence her decision regarding abortion."

Dr. Wambach found that 89% of those hypnotized said they did not become part of the fetus until after six months of gestation. A large group said they did not join the fetus, or experience inside it, until just before or during the birth process. They existed fully conscious as an entity apart from the fetus and even after six months many reported being 'in' and 'out' of the fetal body. "Many subjects reported that the onrush of physical sensations on emerging from the birth canal was disturbing and very unpleasant. Apparently the soul exists in a quite different environment in the between-life state. The physical senses bring so much vivid input that the soul feels almost 'drowned' in light, cold air, sounds. Surprising to me was the frequent report that the new-born infant feels cut off, diminished, alone compared to the between-life state. To be alive in a body is to be alone and unconnected. Perhaps we are alive to learn to break through the screen of the senses, to experience while in a body the transcendent self we truly are."

Dr. Wambach found that a certain number of people she hypnotized actually saw into future lives. What they saw concerned her--a devastated and depopulated world. So in the early 1980s, Dr. Wambach decided again to apply systematic methods. She did a huge study that involved over 2,500 people undergoing hypnotic future life progression.

Carbon

Finally, I told them that I wouldn't go any farther. At that time they changed completely. They became much more aggressive and insisted that I was going with them. A number of them began to push and shove me, and I responded by hitting back at them.

A wild orgy of frenzied taunting, screaming and hitting ensued. I fought like a wild man. All the while it was obvious that they were having great fun.

It seemed to be, almost, a game for them, with me as the center-piece of their amusement. My pain became their pleasure. They seemed to want to make me hurt by clawing at me and biting me. Whenever I would get one off me, there were five more to replace the one.

By this time it was almost complete darkness, and I had the sense that instead of there being twenty or thirty, there were an innumerable host of them. Each one seemed set on coming in for the sport they got from hurting me. My attempts to fight back only provoked greater merriment. They began to physically humiliate me in the most degrading ways. As I continued to fight on and on, I was aware that they weren't in any hurry to win. They were playing with me just as a cat plays with a mouse. Every new assault brought howls of cacophony. Then at some point, they began to tear off pieces of my flesh. To my horror I realized I was being taken apart and eaten alive, slowly, so that their entertainment would last as long a possible.

At no time did I ever have any sense that the beings who seduced and attacked me were anything other than human beings. The best way I can describe them is to think of the worst imaginable person stripped of every impulse to do good. Some of them seemed to be able to tell others what to do, but I had no sense of any structure or hierarchy in an organizational sense. They didn't appear to be controlled or directed by anyone. Basically they were a mob of beings totally driven by unbridled cruelty and passions.

During our struggle I noticed that they seemed to feel no pain. Other than that they appeared to possess no special non-human or super-human abilities.

Making sense, taking an argument apart piece by piece, staying on topic....nope not yet sorry bud.

Thankfully, quantum theory is allowing new paradigms to take flight such as the theory that the basic building block of the universe is not matter but consciousness itself. This transcendent view of consciousness also is found in ancient religious texts. It is also found in recent scientific studies on prayer which show that hospital patients benefit from the prayers of strangers even when they aren't aware that someone is praying for them. These studies have been interpreted by researchers to be an indication that consciousness behaves much like a magnetic field which can be affected by other magnetic fields.

The old paradigm of observing, theorizing, and predicting doesn't work very well when studying light and consciousness - especially when it concerns NDEs. It also allows "paradigm cops" to dismiss NDEs as being caused by brain anomalies even though the cause of NDEs is not relevant to whether the experience is real or not. Nevertheless, recent studies have ruled out brain anomalies. The old paradigm denies a whole range of valid experiences including those described in ancient religious texts. It is this paradigm of the West that vehemently disregards out-of-body realms of consciousness. Albert Einstein, the father of the new paradigm, may have the old paradigm in mind when he said, "All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it." The new paradigm suggests that we don't merely experience reality; we create reality with our minds. And if minds can transcend physical bodies and experience clear visions of verified events which they could not have possibly experienced under the old paradigm, then it is time to abandon the old paradigm and focus on the new one. This became even more obvious when in December of 2001, Dr. Pim van Lommel published an article in The Lancet, the United Kingdom's highly respected journal of medicine, about a study he conducted showing that 18 percent of clinically dead patients recalled having a NDE. He also documented verified events that were experienced by patients from a perspective removed from their bodies.

Verified evidence of a transcendent consciousness? Survival after death? So where's the confetti and streamers? Why is there mostly silence from the scientific community at large about it? Here's why.

Let's hope NDE veridical evidence isn't largely ignored by the scientific community as it has been with scientific evidence of reincarnation. When Dr. Ian Stevenson completed a study and published his findings in a book entitled Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation (1967), he provided outstanding scientific reasoning which concluded that reincarnation is the only viable explanation that fits the data he collected. He considered every possible alternative explanation considering twenty cases of children who were spontaneously able to describe a previous lifetime as soon as they learned to talk. Stevenson ruled out each alternative explanation using one or more aspects of his cases. Later research supported his case in favor of the existence of reincarnation. His study is reproducible and anyone who doubts the validity of his study can repeat it for themselves. But because of the old paradigm, this great scientific discovery will remain generally ignored by the scientific community and the world. So until the new paradigm is firmly established, reincarnation and the transcendental nature of consciousness will continue to be considered the greatest scientific discoveries of all time by those who can see the quantum light with quantum eyes

Einstein stated that infinite smallness was just as possible theoretically as infinite bigness.

I find this quote interesting because in essence, we do have an inifinite smallness.

I remember a teacher demonstrating for us in grade school that if she kept walking halfway toward the door she'd never leave the room, astounding us kids in the process.

Thinking about it, if matter just keeps growing infinitely, it doesn't grow out of existence. This same concept can be applied to the reverse.

Scientists are finding smaller and smaller things everyday, just like we're constantly discovering new objects in outer space.

one could say that infinite bigness goes from 1 to infiniti, and that inifinite smallness goes from 1 to 0. The only difference is what side of the decimal you're on.

The Secret Life of Plants (1973) is a book by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird, described as "A fascinating account of the physical, emotional, and spiritual relations between plants and man."

The book explores the idea that plants may be sentient, despite their lack of a nervous system and a brain, an idea not supported by mainstream biology. This sentience has purportedly been observed through changes in plants' conductivity, as through a polygraph, as pioneered by Cleve Backster.

The trick is to be infinitely small and large at the same time, so that you cancel out and become nothing. Nothing = Everything